First we read that Stuart Hall was innocent. Then we read he was guilty, but only of touching a nine year old through her clothes. Rape charges were dropped and the media has reported a nicely packaged and sanitised version of events.
Then this article appeared in the Independent:
In the article it states:
“To have a man of my father’s age take a benevolent interest in me seemed wonderful to a girl of my history,” she writes. She went to the studios encouraged by her mum and head teacher. And went back again, and once more. He seemed caring. Then, having groomed her, she alleges, he got her drunk and started the abuse. She kept going back. His mates, she claims, helped Hall with his filthy hobby. he sex acts hurt. Sometimes she bled.”
Shocking stuff. So Stuart Hall isn’t just an old groper. He raped a child until…
View original post 232 more words